It’s been about 6 weeks since my last post. The reason for my radio silence is that I have been involved in a project with the Australian Medical Professionals Society (AMPS). A report is being produced to be presented to our politicians at the next sitting of parliament. I have written one of the chapters. It has involved a detailed analysis of mortality in Australia. In my next few articles, I’ll be providing some background leading up to the conclusions from my report. You are going to find it interesting.
There are so many things to talk about, but in this article, I want to provide information on legal proceedings that have just been submitted.
The Case
The new legal proceedings were launched on 6 July 2023, naming Pfizer and Moderna as the Defendants.
The case has been prepared by human rights lawyers Julian Gillespie LLB, B Juris, who designed and is leading this action along with instructing solicitor Katie Ashby-Koppens.
From the lawyers:
In a nutshell: the Lipid Nanoparticle modified RNA technology used by Pfizer and Moderna satisfy Australian legal definitions for being properly deemed Genetically Modified Organisms, or GMOs. Almost identical legal definitions are found in many other countries, including the EU. Synthetic and natural RNA has over four decades of science acknowledging how easily it can integrate with genomic DNA.
The dangers of such technology are well known.
Both Pfizer and Moderna have long been aware of these legal definitions but chose to ignore them when seeking to introduce their C-19 Products to the Australian market.
AstraZeneca on the other hand did not seek to avoid its legal obligations and properly sought a GMO License (DIR 180) from the Australian Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) prior to seeking provisional approval from the Australian TGA.
The TGA should have first consulted with the OGTR.
For full details see the website of Human Rights Lawyers, Maat’s Method, led by Peter Fam. I love the origin of the firm’s name:
‘Maat’ is the Kemetic (Ancient Egyptian) deity of Truth, Justice and Balance. 'Maat's Method' is our company and platform. We are proud to stand in the light and tradition of our ancestors for the benefit of the modern world.
There is a letter from Julian Gillespie and also several attachments regarding the case for those interested. They have done so much background research on the underlying technology.
I found it most interesting that Astra Zeneca did seek the appropriate licenses while Pfizer and Moderna did not.
I have got to know both Julian and Peter through assisting them with technical support on a previous case and can attest to how tirelessly they have been working on social justice issues.
As I was completing my own report with AMPS I had asked Julian to review it. This was right at the same time this case was being lodged and he still made time over a weekend to go through my report line by line and provide valuable comments.
What else has been happening?
Unfortunately, NSW and Victorian Firefighters and some other workers are still mandated out of work. No words to describe the absurdity/maliciousness. This is at a time when companies are instructed to destroy records of vaccination of employees. Businesses in the State of Victoria are now required to destroy COVID vaccination records collected to meet privacy regulations. See here and here.
The Chief Health Officer of Victoria has resigned after being missing in action for 10 months. After presiding over what was possibly the longest lockdown anywhere in the world he has been awarded “Victorian of the Year”, for the State which may have had the worst health outcomes in Australia during COVID.
Mainstream media reported on a poor lady in Queensland who has had COVID 10 times and is waiting to get a 5th dose. See Ivo’s substack post. The news article got much international attention. A post by eugyppius has over 400 comments!
In news doing the rounds today a professor believes he has found the solution to COVID as he has not had COVID in the 3 years. It is a heparin nasal spray. Heparin is a blood thinner. Apparently nasal administration does not thin the blood. One of the reasons that the Professor believes heparin should be tried is that he:
reassured the use of heparin is safe given it’s the second most widely used drug in the world that’s been used as an intravenous anticoagulant for eight decades.
Hmmm makes one think of another, safe, widely used medicine, we weren’t allowed to use during COVID.
They are trying to get enough people for a trial. Those allergic to heparin, have been diagnosed with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or have had a recurrent blood nose that required hospitalisation in the last three months are not eligible for the study.
I wonder if it’s necessary to spray into one’s eyes as well?
Stay tuned for my report on trends in mortality in Australia.
Looking forward to reading your chapter Andrew and joining you in Canberra in October to speak, hopefully to a large audience of politicians, public servants and pollies, about our contributions to the AMPS book. Kara, Editor and Production crew working frantically to solve all the problems we and others threw at them deserve medals.
Praying this case goes well and a loophole may get this all unstuck but I fear we've lost our judicial system, either through corruption, scientific stupidity or fear... So whatever has happened they're on board with unthinkable transgressions of basic human rights, bodily autonomy and freedom of speech. So we can't count on them it seems...
This was confirmed by my fair work experience, which was a total farce.
I took a stand for future generations, and lost my job (don't really care to work for tin pot tyrants anyway), but I do what I can to try and make the process of takeover as hard as possible for those in bed with this plan, I even got called an "antivaxxer" by work's lawyer in my mediation just to top it all off (even though prior to this, I did take vaccines, I won't now though, this has really put me off any vaccine).
Despite well referenced material on my behalf - I studied biology at uni - and no material on my workplace's behalf (or for that matter, Fairwork itself)... The mediator was just desperate for me to agree works direction was "fair and reasonable" despite knowing the direction is fundamentally illegal...
I lost, knowing full well that I would... So many others had.
I wasn't there to keep my job of course, I was there to make sure that this process was a time consuming painful letter writing, legal sh!t fight for my workplace, long letters to read full of peer reviewed science, lawyers needed to be engaged to write every response, I included previous legal rulings from fair work, plus the fact an employee was already mRNA injured at our workplace, so further pursuit of a mandate policy is criminal negligence in OH&S terms (especially given the vax doesn't prevent spread) etc etc... Can't even begin to imagine what that cost in lawyers fees... I represented myself, and didn't spend a penny...
A further six people at my workplace either had a relative dead or injured following the jab so didn't want it, or were aware that it wasn't safe... they were allowed to wait for Novavax (knowing that even that has a high myocarditis risk with it), if they'd all been like me and said "no"... Work would have been in a desperate position... But of course they all caved.... Prisoners to a mortgage... Basically their "life" was threatened, as the modern world is a sea of debt... But if they said no, as a collective, work almost certainly would have to cave, as their skills are very hard to come by... I can only imagine their fear as they lined up for a medication they didn't want (or need)...
I've probably gone on long enough, but this country has been lost it seems, I won't count on judges as Fairwork's Commissioner Riordan was taken off for "re-education" after stating pre existing rights Australian citizens had against being mandated experimental tech under our constitution, he's not a legal novice, so his statements were likely spot on... But his statements were buried, so what happened that the rest of the legal fraternity were told to ignore such rights?
Another alarm bell re safety might be found in the fact that Pfizer brought in a "special" batch of covid vaccines for their employees only that were not required to be checked by the TGA?? There was plenty of Pfizer vaccines here already, why did there employees need a special batch??
The WEF deception has fooled many, and corrupted our government and institutions, I can only hope we turn this slippery slope around, maybe a brave judge, but I doubt it, they've all shrunk into cowardice... My main hope is, as a united population... If more wake up out of the brainwashing from our media and govt, and take a look around at what has happened... stand up to our would be masters and say "No". Then this would be over.
Source re Pfizer special batch TGA
https://twitter.com/tweetiebirdcjs/status/1485140955783393280?t=-Crf-Qh1yYbo0DDf4mwMBQ&s=19
Verified by looking up:
Lot number: FD0927*
https://www.tga.gov.au/batch-release-assessment-covid-19-vaccines
The batch number says to "see remarks"... The remarks are:
"Not tested. OCABR Reviewed. Limited batch quantity allocated for use in Pfizer Australia employee vaccination program"
Fairwork Commisioner Riordan reference:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2021fwcfb6015.htm
From Section [110] onwards there was a solid legal foundation as to why covid vaccines cannot be forced upon the individual by an employer citing existing rights and laws.
Best summed up at the end:
"Can COVID vaccinations be mandated by employers on health and safety grounds? [130] The short answer to this question, in almost every case, is no."