We learn from the Blacked out FOI document 4558_0 - obtained by Senator Malcolm Roberts, that the TGA was testing specifically for "ResiduaI DNA Template" using qPCR in 2020.
It was a great pleasure to be part of this "Canberra Blitz" and to meet you Andrew and Lena and other team members.
Support from family and friends is vital as we delve into the dirty lttle secrets of Big Pharma funded TGA and the $Billions they send their way.
I can see that all that is unredacted is some Lot Numbers. One is in a strange format. Then 3 column headings "Residual DNA Template", "qPCR" and a Date. The earliest date is 1 Dec 2020. But that is well before jabs arrived in Australia. They arrived in Feb 2021 didn't they? There is photo in the media of first jabs arriving on plane. Does it mean TGA didn't actually do these tests?
Yes, the TGA often waves through the crap based on a foreign authority certificate. The blacked out pages must contain extensive discussion of the Endotoxin results as well. A trap in FOI demands is using too narrowly defined terms to reduce costs.
"There should be an FOI request on toner cartridge expenses at the TGA."
LoL that is so funny !!!
Perhaps they would redact an FOI on the toner used given the TGA's bankrollers might find it too embarassing. 96% of the TGA's funding comes from Big Pharma ! (Their customers who are buying drug approvals.) The TGA has the audacity to claim that fact does not create a conflict of interest/bias).
Thanks for the links. Great Maryanne Demasi got that article in the BMJ. It wouldn't have got into some of the others like the Lancet. We had an interesting comment from one politician we met. Regarding the 96% funding by industry, he said that shouldn't be taken as assuming undue influence. Its just a government funding model for certain agencies that we have in Australia, ie making the user pay for services. It seems very naive to me to assume that with something as important as healthcare we can assume this model will work.
Great work. Your presentation was really good. Just enough to explain and highlight what you’ve done in your paper without going off into the weeds. I think it’s often harder to come up with a good summary than it is to explain it in full. Those that are interested in further detail will read the paper and those that would never have read the paper will at least get the gist of it.
We learn from the Blacked out FOI document 4558_0 - obtained by Senator Malcolm Roberts, that the TGA was testing specifically for "ResiduaI DNA Template" using qPCR in 2020.
It was a great pleasure to be part of this "Canberra Blitz" and to meet you Andrew and Lena and other team members.
Support from family and friends is vital as we delve into the dirty lttle secrets of Big Pharma funded TGA and the $Billions they send their way.
Same here Geoff. Thanks for your support.
I looked again at the pdf FOI response doc:
I can see that all that is unredacted is some Lot Numbers. One is in a strange format. Then 3 column headings "Residual DNA Template", "qPCR" and a Date. The earliest date is 1 Dec 2020. But that is well before jabs arrived in Australia. They arrived in Feb 2021 didn't they? There is photo in the media of first jabs arriving on plane. Does it mean TGA didn't actually do these tests?
Yes, the TGA often waves through the crap based on a foreign authority certificate. The blacked out pages must contain extensive discussion of the Endotoxin results as well. A trap in FOI demands is using too narrowly defined terms to reduce costs.
"There should be an FOI request on toner cartridge expenses at the TGA."
LoL that is so funny !!!
Perhaps they would redact an FOI on the toner used given the TGA's bankrollers might find it too embarassing. 96% of the TGA's funding comes from Big Pharma ! (Their customers who are buying drug approvals.) The TGA has the audacity to claim that fact does not create a conflict of interest/bias).
https://joannenova.com.au/2023/06/when-the-government-agencies-that-approve-drugs-are-actually-96-funded-by-big-pharma/
https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj.o1538 (by Mary Anne Demasey a leading (ex?) ABC investigative journalist)
Thanks again for your hard work and representing all those who desire the truth being brought to light, accountability and justice.
Thanks for the links. Great Maryanne Demasi got that article in the BMJ. It wouldn't have got into some of the others like the Lancet. We had an interesting comment from one politician we met. Regarding the 96% funding by industry, he said that shouldn't be taken as assuming undue influence. Its just a government funding model for certain agencies that we have in Australia, ie making the user pay for services. It seems very naive to me to assume that with something as important as healthcare we can assume this model will work.
Great work. Your presentation was really good. Just enough to explain and highlight what you’ve done in your paper without going off into the weeds. I think it’s often harder to come up with a good summary than it is to explain it in full. Those that are interested in further detail will read the paper and those that would never have read the paper will at least get the gist of it.
Thank you all for your dedication to the truth and to our health and our choices.