It was clear even to ordinary people like me in 2021 that something bad was happening so these politicians and bureaucrats have no excuse. I went through some of the available statistics at the time for a video of one of my tracks that I had composed earlier in that year. I started with some comparisons to 2019 influenza stats and then compared excess deaths of 2021 to covid deaths. I made the video in Sept-Oct 2021 so this was well before covid hit.
You may want to turn your sound down if you look at it, I was pretty angry and the music reflects that mood. The clip starts where those stats start.
Thanks for sharing the video, really well made. Looking back now the stats at the beginning are interesting. The brutal scenes in the second half are part of the reason I got involved because I never thought such a thing could happen in Australia.
I was going to include more of the scientists at the end of the video as per the beginning but then "all hell broke loose" and the scenes seemed to suit the music which was actually about 6 months old at that stage. It's the only video I have ever made so it's good to know someone can appreciate it. I played in a band with my brother for about 10 years through the 90's and he did not even comment on the video after I sent it to him.
Anyway, really appreciate your efforts to shed light on this topic.
Great video. It is extraordinary to look back at the total insanity that engulfed the country, and particularly Victoria Police.
While they were play-acting their doomsday scenario with their guns and their tanks on the streets over a cold, real people were suffering under their tyrannical enforcement.
People lost businesses and livelihoods, then homes, then hope, and finally sons and fathers to suicides, and drug and alcohol-inflicted deaths of despair.
What they did (on behalf of feckless Politicians) deeply traumatised the entire country.
I will never look at Police in the same way again.
This was a grievous assault against the community, and a gross breach of trust I don't expect to be restored in our lifetimes.
It’s infuriating watching bureaucrats disrespectfully slip, slide and squirm so as not to directly answer questions! Has our ‘system’ lost so much integrity, that telling the truth has become a radical practice. And what’s more important than the truth is to maintain fanciful narratives while people suffer. My question is; why all the deception and deceit by these bureaucrats?
Yes, depopulation explains a lot of things really. In fact, it doesn’t seem to be difficult to link most culturally disruptive events to reducing the population. Take the transgender push. Making it a mainstream issue is more or less a recruitment drive for vulnerable minds. Once transitioned, we essentially have voluntary sterilisation!
Population reduction my friend. They were freaking out in 1992 that the global population had reached 5 billion. We're now at 8 billion.
"By any means neccessary" is exactly what it sounds like.
And if the global citizenry were ever to find out they'd just attempted a human cull, there would be bodies in the streets. This is the dark, ugly reason that we will never have accountability.
BRAVO. 👏👏👏 I'm preaching to the already thoroughly converted!
(Great video btw).
It nicely summed up that these aspirations have been ongoing for a very long time, and people can't quite believe it could be true but that's only because they're unaware that there has been a long history of stating this exact intent.
The inconsistencies of Covid make perfect sense once viewed through the depop prism.
It explains why they had to fake a pandemic.
Why they unleashed deadly protocols to get the numbers up.
Why the disabled and the elderly were targeted.
Why doctors and dissenting voices were silenced.
Why the media hyped it so furiously.
Why they refuse to pull the shots off the market.
Why every Government is running from the excess deaths issue.
1. Listen to question noting temporal correlation between jab rollout and excess deaths and whether this has been investigated to be sure of causation.
2. Respond slowly to take up time, and gape earnestly if perceiving the opportunity. This may prompt the Senator to interrupt to hurry things up, and further interjections from the Chair against the interruptions.
3. Comment that the deaths have already been discussed, hinting that there is 'no news here' and that the Senator is a nuisance.
4. Remark extremely slowly that these things need to be studied rather than just making an assumption on the basis of temporal correlations, making it seem like that's not what the Senator just asked about.
5. Add that one of the aspects being studied is deaths amongst the vaccinated vs unvaccinated, and assert that this research has enabled them to discount the vaccines as a cause of death, without giving any reasoning for this conclusion, and refusing to say what the causes of death were, apart from covid infection.
Is that about it? The other obvious point of concern is that interviews in the USA with healthcare workers and loved ones of those who with recorded hospital covid deaths strongly suggest that many people, including the unvaccinated, received treatment regimes with a problematic risk-benefit ratio, including dangerous anti-virals. Some felt that those known to be unvaccinated received more careless treatment. This highly significant increase in death rates requires us to investigate all of this, as a narrow 'vaccine vs no vaccine' framing may easily allow it to escape under the radar. Possibly that is why the top bureaucrat here went that way and didn't want to specifically discuss mortality causation.
Your 5 points above are spot on. You have highlighted the tactics being used to deflect away from the real issues. You wonder whether this is all prepared or just reflex responses.
You don't even need to read the whole study. A picture tells a thousand words - pg 14.
The graph for ADHD is particularly telling and seems to be entirely driven by childhood vaccination.
From the study: "Remarkably, zero of the 561 unvaccinated patients in the study had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling".
Thank you for this great article! Very complex statistical concepts explained clearly to show plainly there is an excess mortality crisis in Australia that is not simply correlation. Dr Gould has been at this for a while now too (see here: https://shiftedparadigms.substack.com/p/australias-ageing-population)
Thanks for linking your article on substack. I will go through it in detail.
So it seems previously our bureaucrat tried to say that the excess was due to "aging population" such that the population suddenly aged so much in one year this excess occurred. It will be useful to collect all these responses with references to the Hansard.
Great stuff Andrew as always! Yes they are quick to say that 'correlation is not causation' but we should always immediately add that 'causation requires correlation'. It's a necessary but not sufficient condition. So when we see correlation it means - stop and think about whether there is a plausible mechansim that could be causal.
Im so encouraged you continue to bring your expertise and feasance when those who HAVE a duty of care are deliberately obviscating the real data...thankyou to you and Clare as shown in the video. If you are going to be 'scientifi'c please use the term the patent owners themselves used of their product, 'genetically modified therapies'. They were/are NOT vaccines. Link: See Dr David Martin update......https://www.bitchute.com/video/NunlqRRNLXun/
.. aka .. dishonesty and running protection and cover for the 'responsible' ministries and politicians appointed to oversee them throughout Covid
.. who happened to fail in their respective duties
it is a concerted racket of concealment and lies brought to us all by Bureaubabble .. in this instance by Phillip Gould, a disgusting and evasive worm aiding and abetting in this attempted cover-up, while seeking to maintain their variously $1MM a year salaries
.. salaries paid to massage the data and lie to us
let us not mince words
will Phillip next say your PhD and extensive examination of the same data (and much more) is spurious, too?
Hi Julian. Perhaps I can be a bit more sympathetic to our beleaguered First Assistant Secretary. Perhaps an analogy is Percy Weasley from Harry Potter. The Weasley family is the essence of a good family. Percy is head boy at school destined for great things, and goes on to be the Assistant to the Minister of Magic. In that role he works against Harry and his friends and Dumbledore's Army. It all changes when "He who must not be named" appears at the end of one of the installments and they realise he's back. Percy turns back to the good side.
It would be humorous if the issues at stake were not so serious.
A discussion we had on causality conditions and this senate exchange led me to writing this article and trying to tease out the temporal causality argument.
I have a new take on blood and lung physiology that dismisses the gaseous exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide.
Oxygen is a man made product of air NOT a constituent of air.
Oxygen is made by stripping air of moisture eg medical oxygen has 67ppm of water contamination. Oxygen is measured by its dryness.
Air is measured by its moisture or humidity eg it’s 65% humidity today.
The lung alveoli requires air to reach 100% humidity, that is dew point.
Can you comprehend the mismatch?
Oxygen on release from a container extracts moisture from its surroundings in order to return to it’s natural state, air. Oxygen released into the respiratory tract extracts moisture from the mucosa and delicate alveoli causing damage and even death.
Reactive oxygen species ROS describes damage due to dehydration.
The lungs are responsible for re-hydrating the red blood cells as they pass through the alveoli capillaries with saline water. A saline intravenous drip rehydrates red blood cells and aids the lungs.
Oxygen toxicity is directly related to its power to dehydrate.
Phil Gould, ones a good footy coach, the others a complete grub. Can these excess deaths be stratified even further, by State, region, etc? Do we actually know the actual numbers, right down to the Hospital, GP, Pharmacy, retirement homes or wherever these poor buggers were jabbed? Were these creatures targetting certain areas? I'm not a statistician but I am very interested in your efforts. Ask Gerard to ask this non Australian for the National Cabinet Documents so we can all see what's going on.
Phil Gould, ones a good footy coach, the others a complete grub. Can these excess deaths be stratified even further, by State, region, etc? Do we actually know the actual numbers, right down to the Hospital, GP, Pharmacy, retirement homes or wherever these poor buggers were jabbed? Were these creatures targetting certain areas? I'm not a statistician but I am very interested in your efforts. Ask Gerard to ask this non Australian for the National Cabinet Documents so we can all see what's going on.
It was clear even to ordinary people like me in 2021 that something bad was happening so these politicians and bureaucrats have no excuse. I went through some of the available statistics at the time for a video of one of my tracks that I had composed earlier in that year. I started with some comparisons to 2019 influenza stats and then compared excess deaths of 2021 to covid deaths. I made the video in Sept-Oct 2021 so this was well before covid hit.
You may want to turn your sound down if you look at it, I was pretty angry and the music reflects that mood. The clip starts where those stats start.
https://vimeo.com/620536885#t=266s
Thanks for sharing the video, really well made. Looking back now the stats at the beginning are interesting. The brutal scenes in the second half are part of the reason I got involved because I never thought such a thing could happen in Australia.
I was going to include more of the scientists at the end of the video as per the beginning but then "all hell broke loose" and the scenes seemed to suit the music which was actually about 6 months old at that stage. It's the only video I have ever made so it's good to know someone can appreciate it. I played in a band with my brother for about 10 years through the 90's and he did not even comment on the video after I sent it to him.
Anyway, really appreciate your efforts to shed light on this topic.
Great video. It is extraordinary to look back at the total insanity that engulfed the country, and particularly Victoria Police.
While they were play-acting their doomsday scenario with their guns and their tanks on the streets over a cold, real people were suffering under their tyrannical enforcement.
People lost businesses and livelihoods, then homes, then hope, and finally sons and fathers to suicides, and drug and alcohol-inflicted deaths of despair.
What they did (on behalf of feckless Politicians) deeply traumatised the entire country.
I will never look at Police in the same way again.
This was a grievous assault against the community, and a gross breach of trust I don't expect to be restored in our lifetimes.
It’s infuriating watching bureaucrats disrespectfully slip, slide and squirm so as not to directly answer questions! Has our ‘system’ lost so much integrity, that telling the truth has become a radical practice. And what’s more important than the truth is to maintain fanciful narratives while people suffer. My question is; why all the deception and deceit by these bureaucrats?
Because you can only cover up the original Big Lie, with more lies.
Yes, I agree with you. However, it doesn’t answer the big question …why are they doing what they are doing in the first place?
Yes, depopulation explains a lot of things really. In fact, it doesn’t seem to be difficult to link most culturally disruptive events to reducing the population. Take the transgender push. Making it a mainstream issue is more or less a recruitment drive for vulnerable minds. Once transitioned, we essentially have voluntary sterilisation!
Population reduction my friend. They were freaking out in 1992 that the global population had reached 5 billion. We're now at 8 billion.
"By any means neccessary" is exactly what it sounds like.
And if the global citizenry were ever to find out they'd just attempted a human cull, there would be bodies in the streets. This is the dark, ugly reason that we will never have accountability.
Eco-92 Earth Charter
https://gab.com/sng0777/posts/111542908707137678
Well, that’s an interesting hypothesis… here’s my hypothesis, I reckon you’ll find it as interesting as I found your’s https://rumble.com/v3oap32-lets-talk-about-sustainability-and-thinning-the-herd.html
BRAVO. 👏👏👏 I'm preaching to the already thoroughly converted!
(Great video btw).
It nicely summed up that these aspirations have been ongoing for a very long time, and people can't quite believe it could be true but that's only because they're unaware that there has been a long history of stating this exact intent.
The inconsistencies of Covid make perfect sense once viewed through the depop prism.
It explains why they had to fake a pandemic.
Why they unleashed deadly protocols to get the numbers up.
Why the disabled and the elderly were targeted.
Why doctors and dissenting voices were silenced.
Why the media hyped it so furiously.
Why they refuse to pull the shots off the market.
Why every Government is running from the excess deaths issue.
It explains ALL of it.
So this particular obfuscation tactic is:
1. Listen to question noting temporal correlation between jab rollout and excess deaths and whether this has been investigated to be sure of causation.
2. Respond slowly to take up time, and gape earnestly if perceiving the opportunity. This may prompt the Senator to interrupt to hurry things up, and further interjections from the Chair against the interruptions.
3. Comment that the deaths have already been discussed, hinting that there is 'no news here' and that the Senator is a nuisance.
4. Remark extremely slowly that these things need to be studied rather than just making an assumption on the basis of temporal correlations, making it seem like that's not what the Senator just asked about.
5. Add that one of the aspects being studied is deaths amongst the vaccinated vs unvaccinated, and assert that this research has enabled them to discount the vaccines as a cause of death, without giving any reasoning for this conclusion, and refusing to say what the causes of death were, apart from covid infection.
Is that about it? The other obvious point of concern is that interviews in the USA with healthcare workers and loved ones of those who with recorded hospital covid deaths strongly suggest that many people, including the unvaccinated, received treatment regimes with a problematic risk-benefit ratio, including dangerous anti-virals. Some felt that those known to be unvaccinated received more careless treatment. This highly significant increase in death rates requires us to investigate all of this, as a narrow 'vaccine vs no vaccine' framing may easily allow it to escape under the radar. Possibly that is why the top bureaucrat here went that way and didn't want to specifically discuss mortality causation.
Your 5 points above are spot on. You have highlighted the tactics being used to deflect away from the real issues. You wonder whether this is all prepared or just reflex responses.
Excellent summation. I'd add that Number 5 is likely an outright lie.
Vaccinated vs Unvaccinated studies are completely verboten, because of what they would reveal.
Dr Paul Thomas did the only substantial one I know of in existence, and for that, they yanked his license and destroyed his reputation.
I don't think I knew that!! Must look it up.
You don't even need to read the whole study. A picture tells a thousand words - pg 14.
The graph for ADHD is particularly telling and seems to be entirely driven by childhood vaccination.
From the study: "Remarkably, zero of the 561 unvaccinated patients in the study had attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). The implications of these results for the net public health effects of whole-population vaccination and with respect for informed consent on human health are compelling".
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/346088816_Relative_Incidence_of_Office_Visits_and_Cumulative_Rates_of_Billed_Diagnoses_Along_the_Axis_of_Vaccination
Thank you for this information. US pathologist Dr Ryan Cole on the absence of the nucleocapsid (11 minutes): https://rumble.com/v1ob6pu--dr.-ryan-cole-is-the-only-pathologist-in-the-usa-willing-to-test-for-the-v.html
that's why Senator Rennick asks for tissue samples I imagine
Thank you for this great article! Very complex statistical concepts explained clearly to show plainly there is an excess mortality crisis in Australia that is not simply correlation. Dr Gould has been at this for a while now too (see here: https://shiftedparadigms.substack.com/p/australias-ageing-population)
Thanks for linking your article on substack. I will go through it in detail.
So it seems previously our bureaucrat tried to say that the excess was due to "aging population" such that the population suddenly aged so much in one year this excess occurred. It will be useful to collect all these responses with references to the Hansard.
Yes he has form.
David Gruen, the "Australian Statistician" has done so in Estimates previously as well.
I have been cut and pasting every few months when the numbers changed.
First covid patient 25 January 2020
Start of Vaccinations 22 February 2021
Excess Deaths in Australia per 100K on the right
April 2020-March 2021= -17
April 2020-Dec 12th 2021= -14
Apr 6th 2020-Feb 27th 2022= 14
Apr 6th 2020-Mar 27th 2022= 19
Apr 6th 2020-May 29th 2022=. 33
Apr 6th 2020-Jun 26th 2022=. 43
Apr 6th 2020-Jul 31st 2022=. 53
Apr 6th 2020-Aug 28th 2022 60
Apr 6th 2020-Sep 25th 2022. 62
Apr 6th 2020-Nov 27th 2022. 75
Apr 6th 2020-Feb 26th 2023. 92
Apr 6th 2020-Jul 30th 2023. 119
Apr 6th 2020-Nov 26th 2023. 124
Apr 6th 2020-Dec 31st 2023. 130
https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/coronavirus-excess-deaths-tracker
Great stuff Andrew as always! Yes they are quick to say that 'correlation is not causation' but we should always immediately add that 'causation requires correlation'. It's a necessary but not sufficient condition. So when we see correlation it means - stop and think about whether there is a plausible mechansim that could be causal.
And bureaubabble will enter the Aussie language I predict! Inspired!
Im so encouraged you continue to bring your expertise and feasance when those who HAVE a duty of care are deliberately obviscating the real data...thankyou to you and Clare as shown in the video. If you are going to be 'scientifi'c please use the term the patent owners themselves used of their product, 'genetically modified therapies'. They were/are NOT vaccines. Link: See Dr David Martin update......https://www.bitchute.com/video/NunlqRRNLXun/
perfect title Andrew: Bureaubabble
.. aka .. dishonesty and running protection and cover for the 'responsible' ministries and politicians appointed to oversee them throughout Covid
.. who happened to fail in their respective duties
it is a concerted racket of concealment and lies brought to us all by Bureaubabble .. in this instance by Phillip Gould, a disgusting and evasive worm aiding and abetting in this attempted cover-up, while seeking to maintain their variously $1MM a year salaries
.. salaries paid to massage the data and lie to us
let us not mince words
will Phillip next say your PhD and extensive examination of the same data (and much more) is spurious, too?
Hi Julian. Perhaps I can be a bit more sympathetic to our beleaguered First Assistant Secretary. Perhaps an analogy is Percy Weasley from Harry Potter. The Weasley family is the essence of a good family. Percy is head boy at school destined for great things, and goes on to be the Assistant to the Minister of Magic. In that role he works against Harry and his friends and Dumbledore's Army. It all changes when "He who must not be named" appears at the end of one of the installments and they realise he's back. Percy turns back to the good side.
It would be humorous if the issues at stake were not so serious.
A discussion we had on causality conditions and this senate exchange led me to writing this article and trying to tease out the temporal causality argument.
Hi Andrew
I’ve a few articles on the stack.
I have a new take on blood and lung physiology that dismisses the gaseous exchange of oxygen and carbon dioxide.
Oxygen is a man made product of air NOT a constituent of air.
Oxygen is made by stripping air of moisture eg medical oxygen has 67ppm of water contamination. Oxygen is measured by its dryness.
Air is measured by its moisture or humidity eg it’s 65% humidity today.
The lung alveoli requires air to reach 100% humidity, that is dew point.
Can you comprehend the mismatch?
Oxygen on release from a container extracts moisture from its surroundings in order to return to it’s natural state, air. Oxygen released into the respiratory tract extracts moisture from the mucosa and delicate alveoli causing damage and even death.
Reactive oxygen species ROS describes damage due to dehydration.
The lungs are responsible for re-hydrating the red blood cells as they pass through the alveoli capillaries with saline water. A saline intravenous drip rehydrates red blood cells and aids the lungs.
Oxygen toxicity is directly related to its power to dehydrate.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS + supplementary oxygen equals Hyperoxia-Induced Lung Injury HILI
Oxygen is a prescribed drug. It’s primarily prescribed for the terminally ill. Palliative care is not kind.
Oxygen has been used to damage and cull in plain sight.
Mammalian physiology runs on salt plus water, hydration not oxygenation.
Salt restriction directives have caused the huge increase in chronic dis-eases. Dehydration is the first insult that begets dis-ease.
Hyponatremia or dehydration are the same condition.
Unfortunately, bureaucrats such as this, keep their overpaid positions even when the government in power changes.
Phil Gould, ones a good footy coach, the others a complete grub. Can these excess deaths be stratified even further, by State, region, etc? Do we actually know the actual numbers, right down to the Hospital, GP, Pharmacy, retirement homes or wherever these poor buggers were jabbed? Were these creatures targetting certain areas? I'm not a statistician but I am very interested in your efforts. Ask Gerard to ask this non Australian for the National Cabinet Documents so we can all see what's going on.
Another great footy coach comes to mind. Mal Meninga. He quit politics during a press conference as he realised he couldn't spin the bullsh**
💯 percent correct.
Phil Gould, ones a good footy coach, the others a complete grub. Can these excess deaths be stratified even further, by State, region, etc? Do we actually know the actual numbers, right down to the Hospital, GP, Pharmacy, retirement homes or wherever these poor buggers were jabbed? Were these creatures targetting certain areas? I'm not a statistician but I am very interested in your efforts. Ask Gerard to ask this non Australian for the National Cabinet Documents so we can all see what's going on.