Excess Mortality in Australia: When Were the Warning Signs Apparent?
This is a short post with an update on my recent report that I have mentioned in previous articles. I can’t provide any better summary than that written by one of Australia’s leading independent journalists, Rebekah Barnett.
The actual report is available on Researchgate here. It seems to have more interest than other work I have been involved in over the years like cardiac fibrillation patterns, echolocation of false killer whales etc. Go figure? It’s 40 pages and a lot to go through. The graphs and tables tell the story though.
Rebekah tweeted her article and it went viral, being retweeted by people like Peter McCullough and Naomi Wolf. This sent the trolls into a frenzy. For amusement you can browse the responses to the tweets. You can see Rebekah go into battle with the trolls.
A major issue is that trolls overseas don’t understand that states in Australia had no COVID for a period after injections were introduced and before borders opened and the onset of the Omicron variant in Australia.
I saw things like “correlation is not causality”, “base rate fallacy” being espoused. All the things that the report carefully handles. It makes me wonder if some of the comments are actually bots because they seem so irrelevant?
The title of the report explains exactly what it is about. When did the historically high excess mortality, that we are seeing now, commence its run?
The report is not claiming that everyone who was injected is dying. As of today, there are 998 deaths following COVID-19 vaccination reported.
We knew from the Therapeutic Goods Association (TGA) Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN) that the older population comprised the vast majority of the reported deaths following vaccination (see the 3D graph in the Rebekah’s article and the report). We had to extract this from numerous Freedom of Information requests, joining different tables together.
We knew that the TGA had been alerted prior to the rollout here that in Norway a warning had been issued late in 2020 of excess deaths in nursing homes following vaccination. This was ignored.
We know of anecdotal reports from people of death of elderly relatives shortly after injection.
We know through data analysis when death rates started going up, in an environment where there were no COVID deaths in the community.
We saw from my previous post that a week in April 2021 had the highest week to week increase in number of deaths over a 10-year period, apart from the COVID Omicron onset after borders opened.
They are not huge numbers, but every death means something to a family somewhere.
Unfortunately, this is all considered coincidence. The people were old and likely to die anyway, according to experts and authorities.
Indeed, it can be difficult to pick up anomalies in the older age groups. For example, if deaths of frail elderly people are brought forward by weeks or months it is extremely difficult to pick this up. Numbers appear the same if looking at yearly data. It’s like the crime cases where in a nursing home, deaths have been expedited by a “health worker”, eg see Arkmedic’s substack article here. For this reason we need to be extra vigilant.
Many of the comments on twitter were very useful and I intend to go through the valid ones in detail. The best comment, and concise summary, I saw was this one, from “Jurassic Carl”, in response to trolls.
Putting this work together was an effort and I am grateful to many people who helped review and most of all to my wife Lena for her love and patience.
The plan is for the work to be presented in Canberra later this year. I’m going to set up a zoom call in the next few weeks as a trial run for myself to present some of the material and have time for questions and comments. I’ll look forward to seeing some of you then.
Congratulations on 1,825 reads so far on your Researchgate article.
Related content has not received much attention.
https://www.researchgate.net/post/AstraZeneca_Endotoxin_Contamination-Does_Adenovirus_or_other_ingredients_interfere_with_measurement
The initial COVID-19 mRNA and adenoviral vaccines raised antibody levels to SARS-COV-2 to very high levels. If the individual were to be exposed to a closely related strain of the virus, these antibodies have the potential to provide some protective benefits. Wang etc al showed with the SARS virus that it used Fc receptors on the surface of non-ACE2 phagocytic immune cells to infect some of them. Infected immune cells can disrupt the immune cells signals and enable the virus to spread quickly to other tissues prior to viral sepsis. So benefits from being vaccinated switch to negative risks - e.g., higher risk of infections (labeled breakthrough infections) and increased severity of disease for some vaccinated individuals as antibody levels naturally decrease with time (3 to 5 months). These patterns occur in parallel to adverse events and serious adverse events from the vaccines, including death (myocarditis/pericarditis if they survive, etc.).