Thanks Geoff. I think it's that the issues to do with the manufacture of these products is outside the area of expertise of most of us. We are lucky that there are people such as yourself, Kevin McKernan etc that have been looking into it. However for anyone who has been involved in manufacture of any product, it should be unsurprising that once product goes from prototype to high volume that will undoubtedly be issues encountered.
The initial COVID-19 mRNA and adenoviral vaccines raised antibody levels to SARS-COV-2 to very high levels. If the individual were to be exposed to a closely related strain of the virus, these antibodies have the potential to provide some protective benefits. Wang etc al showed with the SARS virus that it used Fc receptors on the surface of non-ACE2 phagocytic immune cells to infect some of them. Infected immune cells can disrupt the immune cells signals and enable the virus to spread quickly to other tissues prior to viral sepsis. So benefits from being vaccinated switch to negative risks - e.g., higher risk of infections (labeled breakthrough infections) and increased severity of disease for some vaccinated individuals as antibody levels naturally decrease with time (3 to 5 months). These patterns occur in parallel to adverse events and serious adverse events from the vaccines, including death (myocarditis/pericarditis if they survive, etc.).
Insightful comment. Thanks. This week's Highwire had Geert Vanden Bosche on discussing his latest thoughts. It's such a complex system that has been played with.
Great report! Like one german report on excessess with deaths and stillbirths. They called local tga PEI "profoundly absurd", since they followed up vaccinated only for one month! My local authorities followed up deaths 2 months after each vax, control group no-vax was followed for 2 full years, beginning 4 months before vax campaign, on a seasonal high. They found out that your risk of dying vaxed is 50% compared to no vax. In the midst of SAME EXCESSES as you bring out.
There is this age bracket stratification. You referred to it in one sentence. Since the harms follow vax rollouts, each agegroup with a similar lag after vaxing, thus younger later than older, this a proof for both temporarility and dose dependency. Same thing in all Western countries, something that prof. Fenton showed from the english ons data. Because they classified <days as unvaxed, and the harms for 1st injections happen ca. 50% within this 2 weeks, the unvaxed experienced a surve of this intervention. I.e. intervention they never received.
Andrew, were you able to calculate the standard deviation for any of the data and if so did it add value in uncovering what you have? IIRC the 2 sigma range for excess mortality is noticeably less than the levels it has reached in the last couple of years.
Thankyou for your thorough analysis Andrew ! Do you have any thoughts as to why during the 5 years to March 2021 the ACM was falling? (Roughly by 2% pa in the 65 to 94 age group). Apologies if you have already mentioned why.
When I started looking into this data I realised there are so many variables to take into account. You are right, mortality was decreasing (life expectancy increasing) for older ages. I presume this is due to better living conditions, medication keeping people alive a bit longer. Another thing I saw when I also looked at population data that there are effects of when people were born. Those that were brought up in war times may have poorer health long term (due to nutrition etc). When we get to the oldest ages the mortality flattens out. Only a few get to reach 100. At younger ages the mortality is pretty flat. But then that gets complicated because the population is more diverse due to immigration in those age ranges.
What I have learnt is that there is no simple metric and authorities do not understand this.
I didn't have time to go into this much in the report, but gathered some interesting data, which if I have a chance will write up. Great question.
Congratulations on 1,825 reads so far on your Researchgate article.
Related content has not received much attention.
https://www.researchgate.net/post/AstraZeneca_Endotoxin_Contamination-Does_Adenovirus_or_other_ingredients_interfere_with_measurement
Thanks Geoff. I think it's that the issues to do with the manufacture of these products is outside the area of expertise of most of us. We are lucky that there are people such as yourself, Kevin McKernan etc that have been looking into it. However for anyone who has been involved in manufacture of any product, it should be unsurprising that once product goes from prototype to high volume that will undoubtedly be issues encountered.
The initial COVID-19 mRNA and adenoviral vaccines raised antibody levels to SARS-COV-2 to very high levels. If the individual were to be exposed to a closely related strain of the virus, these antibodies have the potential to provide some protective benefits. Wang etc al showed with the SARS virus that it used Fc receptors on the surface of non-ACE2 phagocytic immune cells to infect some of them. Infected immune cells can disrupt the immune cells signals and enable the virus to spread quickly to other tissues prior to viral sepsis. So benefits from being vaccinated switch to negative risks - e.g., higher risk of infections (labeled breakthrough infections) and increased severity of disease for some vaccinated individuals as antibody levels naturally decrease with time (3 to 5 months). These patterns occur in parallel to adverse events and serious adverse events from the vaccines, including death (myocarditis/pericarditis if they survive, etc.).
Insightful comment. Thanks. This week's Highwire had Geert Vanden Bosche on discussing his latest thoughts. It's such a complex system that has been played with.
Great report! Like one german report on excessess with deaths and stillbirths. They called local tga PEI "profoundly absurd", since they followed up vaccinated only for one month! My local authorities followed up deaths 2 months after each vax, control group no-vax was followed for 2 full years, beginning 4 months before vax campaign, on a seasonal high. They found out that your risk of dying vaxed is 50% compared to no vax. In the midst of SAME EXCESSES as you bring out.
There is this age bracket stratification. You referred to it in one sentence. Since the harms follow vax rollouts, each agegroup with a similar lag after vaxing, thus younger later than older, this a proof for both temporarility and dose dependency. Same thing in all Western countries, something that prof. Fenton showed from the english ons data. Because they classified <days as unvaxed, and the harms for 1st injections happen ca. 50% within this 2 weeks, the unvaxed experienced a surve of this intervention. I.e. intervention they never received.
Rgds JR
Hi Andrew, are you planning on getting the report peer reviewed? That should lend it more weight that I suspect it deserves.
You have "Debunk the Funk" taking a pot shot. You must be over the target as they say.
Andrew, were you able to calculate the standard deviation for any of the data and if so did it add value in uncovering what you have? IIRC the 2 sigma range for excess mortality is noticeably less than the levels it has reached in the last couple of years.
Thankyou for your thorough analysis Andrew ! Do you have any thoughts as to why during the 5 years to March 2021 the ACM was falling? (Roughly by 2% pa in the 65 to 94 age group). Apologies if you have already mentioned why.
When I started looking into this data I realised there are so many variables to take into account. You are right, mortality was decreasing (life expectancy increasing) for older ages. I presume this is due to better living conditions, medication keeping people alive a bit longer. Another thing I saw when I also looked at population data that there are effects of when people were born. Those that were brought up in war times may have poorer health long term (due to nutrition etc). When we get to the oldest ages the mortality flattens out. Only a few get to reach 100. At younger ages the mortality is pretty flat. But then that gets complicated because the population is more diverse due to immigration in those age ranges.
What I have learnt is that there is no simple metric and authorities do not understand this.
I didn't have time to go into this much in the report, but gathered some interesting data, which if I have a chance will write up. Great question.
Thankyou Andrew. The point of minimal excess deaths in 2021 is so obvious given the slope changes from negative to positive.
Thanks for your efforts!
Amazing work as always!